Recreating the Country
  • Home
  • be Challenged
    • Design to restore lost biodiversity >
      • Diversity >
        • Making a list of plants for revegetation
      • Structure >
        • Ecology Snapshot - wildlife and their habitat
      • Species survival
      • Location - connections
      • Blueprint for Recreating the Counrty
    • Biodiversity and profit >
      • Designing for profit
    • Managing sustainable biorich landscapes
  • be Informed
    • Indigenous flora of the Geelong district >
      • Indigenous plants - what & why
      • Acacias, wattles of the Geelong Region
      • Acacias - the cafes of the bush
      • Allocasuarinas/drooping sheoaks, Black Sheoak & Callitris glaucophylla/cypress-pine
      • Bursaria spinosa, Sweet Bursaria
      • Eucalypts, The Sentinals
      • Exocarpos cupressiformis, Cherry Ballart
      • Moonah, Melaleuca lanceolata
      • Small riparian myrtles
      • Wedge-leaf/Giant Hop-bush, Dodonaea viscosa
      • Wild Plants of Inverleigh
      • Tree Violet - as tenacious as a terrier
    • Nurseryman's diary >
      • Regent Honeyeater - a good news story
      • Give me a home among the gum trees
      • Symbiotic fungi
      • The joys of seed collecting
      • Landcare, who cares?
      • The last Silver Banksia
      • Neds Corner
      • River Red Gums and the Tuscan monks
  • be Entertained
    • Stories for children >
      • Amie and the intoxicated kangaroos
      • The Little Green Caterpillar
      • B'emus'ed - a Christmas tale of bursairas and emus
    • Stories about the natural world >
      • Brushtail
      • Cormorant
      • Eastern Bettongs. 'Truffle junkies' or 'ecosystem engineers'
      • Richards Sweet Rewards
      • Coxy's Curse
      • How the River Red Gum came to be - A dreamtime story
  • Bookshop
  • Blog
    • Easy blog finder
  • Contact

Recreating the Country blog

Managing Grasslands and Grassy Woodlands in temperate Australia. Why we're losing the battle to save them. Part 3. The wisdom of Indigenous Elders

12/2/2018

10 Comments

 
I respectfully acknowledge the traditional custodians of this country past and present. I acknowledge their comprehensive understanding of Australia’s living landscapes. Their culture nurtured this land for over 3,000 generations and used fire as a dynamic management tool.

It’s time to listen and learn from the wisdom of Indigenous Elders. It’s time to adopt Traditional Owner burning methods to nurture and to heal the wild landscapes of rural and urban  Australia?


PictureA fire stick is often used to start a Traditional Owner burn.
‘Fire Stick Farming’

Anthropologist Rhys Jones changed the way the world thought about Indigenous Australians when he published ‘Fire Stick Farming’ in 1969. He began his article about Aboriginal use of fire with a question.

“We imagine that the country seen by the first colonists, before they ring-barked their first tree, was ‘natural.’ But was it?

Jones went on to describe a managed Australian landscape that had been changed by burning to produce a land full of wild vegetables and rich hunting grounds.

He proposed that fire had many uses to the First Australians and importantly it was used to alter the vegetation. For example to push back forests and replace them with grasslands and grassy forests which were richer in animal and plant foods.

PictureThe early explorers found a managed landscape that they compared to an English nobleman's park. Painting J.W Huggins, Swan River 50 miles up 1827
Early explorers observed the effects of indigenous burning

In 1848 explorer Major Thomas Mitchell observed ‘fire stick farming’ in New South Wales and suggested it was used to create a comfortable open living environment;


“The native applies fire to the grass at certain seasons, in order that a young green crop may subsequently spring up and so attract and enable him to kill or take the kangaroo with nets.

In summer, the burning of the long grass also discloses vermin, birds’ nests, etc., on which the females and the children, who chiefly burn the grass, feed. But for this simple process, the Australian woods might have been as thick a jungle, like those of New Zealand or America, instead of open forests”.
  
Explorer Charles Sturt famously described lands around the Murray River in 1830,

 “In many places the trees are so sparingly (and almost judiciously) distributed as to resemble the park lands attached to a gentleman’s residence in England”.

The country that the first explorers described was managed with many small mosaic burns (mostly less than 50ha) that minimised the risk of uncontrolled natural fires. This type of burning conducted every 3 – 4 years produces diverse grasslands and grassy woodlands of varying ages which provides ideal habitat for a diversity of wildlife.


PictureColonial artist Joseph Lycett in 1820 Van Diemen's Land painted the perfect landscape for hunting kangaroos
Indigenous Australian’s use of fire was sophisticated

Bill Gammage in his book ‘The Biggest Estate on Earth’, puts into context what many of the early settlers thought was a natural phenomenon;

“In 1788 people shepherded fire around their country, caging, invigorating, locating and smoothing the immense complexity of Australia’s plant and animals into such harmony that few newcomers saw any hint of a momentous achievement”.

Gammage contends that Indigenous Australians developed complex patterns of burning that favoured desirable plants and animals.

For example, a landscape with belts of well spaced gums next to a wide strip of open grassland and permanent water was perfect for hunting kangaroos.

Each native animal has its preferred habitat and a detailed traditional knowledge enabled the first Australians to replicate these habitats with the sophisticated use of fire.

By doing this they always had a good supply of root vegetables and plenty of the animals they needed for food, tools and clothing. They also knew in which landscapes to find them.



PictureBlack Thursday was one of the largest bushfires to occur in a heavily populated area in Australia’s history. Fifteen people died and 1300 buildings were destroyed. Source - The Guardian
Since 1788 fire has become a constant threat

Burning changed after the traditional burning practice progressively stopped in Southern Australia as the white settlers moved in. The fires became unplanned, much hotter and dangerous. This brought about a dramatic change in the type and density of vegetation as the ‘gentleman’s parks’ became dense tangled thickets.

On Black Thursday February 6th 1851 a devastating fire burnt nearly a quarter of Victoria. A farmer from the Barrabool Hills near Geelong described the aftermath;

‘It was so awful in its aspect, so sudden in its accomplishment, so lamentable in its consequences, that it can only be equaled in those pages of history where invading armies are described as laying countries waste with fire and sword’

Eventually fuel reduction burns became a necessary and accepted part of rural life. Roadsides were burnt as fire breaks and National Parks and Reserves were regularly burned to reduce the fire risk. But did it?
 
Anecdotal evidence suggests that current burning practices are adding to the overall fuel loads. This is because they are often too hot, too infrequent and the timing is based on a pre-set timetable for fuel reduction. Timetables don’t take into account the unique needs of wildlife, the character of the vegetation, the variable seasons or even the local weather conditions that can change radically without notice.

Hot burns result in high rates of germination of fast growing pioneer species like acacias and an increased density of highly flammable fuel within five years.

It is still a commonly held belief of people that manage control burns that ‘a hot burn is a clean burn’ and that the fire should be as hot as possible. This type of burn in a grassy woodland can result in an increase in thick understorey and shrub growth that competes with grasslands species. It also kills significant mature trees with hollows.

Both of these outcomes are undesirable for the park/reserve and its wildlife, as well as for rural communities.



PictureNgarigo elder from the Snowy Mountains, Uncle Rod Mason is skilled in the practice of indigenous cool burning. Photo Tracey McRae
Indigenous traditional knowledge is alive and well

Indigenous elders are now in demand to conduct Traditional Owner burns because of the recognised benefits to the natural environment. For indigenous Australians burning is a spiritual practice that connects them to Country. Burning is also a social occasion even though it is a finely tuned procedure.

You can read an account of a recent Traditional Owner burn at Bakers Lane Reserve, Teesdale at this link ancient-australian-culture-cool-burning.html



PictureTraditional Owner burn at Cape York where burning has been practiced for over 60,000 years. Photo Dale Smithyman
Traditional Owner (T.O.) burns are very different to modern control burns.

  • T.O. burning holds the social and spiritual as key elements of the practice and process. They are a critical to reconnecting Traditional Owners with Country and healing both Country and people.  They are community building events and children are often present
  • A T.O. burn heals and maintains Country and produces white smoke. They are cool burns that feel safe for those taking part. The traditional belief is that black smoke is unhealthy for Country.
  • The fire moves slowly with a flame height not much higher than the grass. This allows enough time for insects, reptiles and small mammals to move away from the fire.
  • A patchy mosaic pattern of burnt and unburnt areas is created. Unburnt areas around fallen logs become natural safe refuges for wildlife.  
  • The bark of trees is rarely blackened (also important habitat for insects) and they never burn into the canopy of trees which is referred to as the ‘spirit place’. The protected canopy provides cooling shade and safe habitat for wildlife.
  • The fire is often started with a ‘fire stick’ and all the other spots are symbolically lit from this first flame. This link between flames is an important expression of a belief in the presence of a ‘fire spirit’ that is respected and nurtured in Aboriginal culture.
  • T.O. burns are done when the time is right. There is no 9 to 5 burning program. Its not unusual for a burn to be at dawn or at night.
  • T.O. burning takes the time that is needed to burn Country correctly. This is at odds with a modern control burn which aims to burn as much as possible as quickly as possible.

PictureRhys Jones, respected Australian Anthropologist. 1941 - 2001
A fifty year old prophecy

I’ll leave the last word on Traditional Owner burning to Anthropologist Rhys Jones who prophetically wrote nearly 50 years ago in ‘Fire Stick Farming’;

 “Probably for tens of’ thousands of years fires were systematically lit by Aborigines and were an integral part of their economy.… we must do what the Aborigines did and burn at regular intervals under controlled conditions.
The days of “fire-stick farming” may not yet be over”.


My thanks to Dale Smithyman, an enthusiastic supporter and student of Traditional Owner burning practice, for his guidance with this blog



PictureTraditional Owner burning project at Bakers Lane Reserve, Teesdale, Wiyn murrup yangaramella was driven by the National Landcare Program. Photo Tracey McRae
A regressive step by the National Landcare Program.

Sadly the visionary funding through the National Landcare Program, to employ Indigenous Natural Resource Management Facilitators at the Catchment Management Authorities, will not be offered in the National Landcare Program Phase 2. 


This decision is extremely disappointing and could be seen as a subtle form of racism that is just as damaging to the re-emergence of a strong indigenous culture as the overt forms of racism that we all despise.

It’s time that we question the deep seated and unconscious bias behind a decision like this. It may have been justified with words like ‘restructuring’ and 'cutting costs', but it is a form of racism that is particularly destructive because of it's frequency and because it often goes unnoticed under our radar.


If you need a brief escape from reality, 'Seeds the monthly Chronicle' is now into chapter 5. Chapter 6 will be posted very soon. Click here to explore>
Picture

This blog describes a Traditional Owner cool burn in detail
Ancient Australian culture - the traditional skill of cool burning

10 Comments
Felicity Spear link
20/2/2018 11:17:12 am

Hi Stephen, Great work.

Would you add us to subscribers please?

Also [email protected]

Currently we are fully occupied objecting to VicRoads proposals for an arterial road through Batesford and its environmental assets.

Reply
Steve
22/2/2018 09:57:05 am

Hi Felicity,
Thank you for your encouraging words. I have heard that you and Peter are putting in a lot of hours writing and lobbying to get a sensible outcome for the Batesford arterial road. Well done, its such a frustrating process isn't it.

It would be an absolute environmental tragedy if the VicRoads decided to fragment the Dog Rock Reserve and Bill's private reserves with a six lane freeway.
I wrote about Bill's reserve in 'The last Silver Banksia'. Go to this link if you would like to have a read;

https://www.recreatingthecountry.com.au/the-last-silver-banksia.html

Reply
Peter O'Gorman
3/3/2018 11:59:17 am

Dear Steve,
re indigenous burning.
The introduction of exotic pasture grasses into the Australian environment, coupled with hot burning practices in the past might mean that traditional aboriginal cold burning techniques might need tweaking if they are to be reintroduced in woodland contexts today.
Peter.

Reply
Steve
5/3/2018 12:48:45 pm

Hi Peter,
They're important observation that you've made and I agree that grassland and grassy woodland vegetation has changed dramatically since 1835. The practice hot burning would have contributed to significantly to this.

So where does that leave us as we look for practical solutions? Could simply changing to Traditional Owner burning practice help turn back the clock?

The short answer is we don't know, but history suggests that it is very likely to be part of the answer.

I think an important tool that we tend to overlook in this complex puzzle of options is monitoring. There is no point blindly adopting a 'new' practice unless we set up proper studies to determine the effect.
As I mentioned in part 1 of this series, monitoring rarely attracts government funding, yet that's what we need to learn and to move forward.

Grazing is another piece of the puzzle that is likely to be important in managing invasive exotic grasses. That will be the topic of part 4, so stay tuned.

Reply
Adrian Brain
23/3/2021 11:19:51 pm

Hello Peter, it's Adrian Brain from Bristol trying to re-establish contact. Old email address still valid.

My apologies to Stephen Murphy for using this method. I haven't found another way.

Reply
Ben Courtice link
13/7/2018 08:26:29 am

I've enjoyed this series a lot, thank you for summarising the frustrations many of us face so succinctly.

A minor quibble. You state that changed fire regimes after European colonisation "brought about a dramatic change in the type and density of vegetation as the ‘gentleman’s parks’ became dense tangled thickets."

I actually think most of the "gentleman's parks" observed by early white explorers became pastoral land. What is left typically comprises our remnant grasslands and grassy woodlands.

Undoubtedly, inappropriate fire regimes can increase woody shrub density in some of these environments. But most of the "tangled thickets" of our existing heathy scrubs, wet sclerophyll forests and so on were probably in a state something like that to begin with. I think it's erroneous to imply that a change in fire regime will magically turn vast swathes of remnant vegetation into productive grassy habitat - a pastoralist's dream, but not a likely outcome. But this implication seems to be made frequently in some of the popular writing on fire management.

I think the main blame for the loss of grassy ecosystems is 230 years of sheep and cattle farming (and cropping in some areas). Within that, certainly, altered fire regimes (typically, too much not too little) have contributed to the loss of so many native species, along with the other factors like rabbits, foxes, invasive weeds, fertilisers, and so on.

The story is probably different in more arid lands like the western desert or the great western woodlands, or in the top end tropical savannah.

None of this should be taken as opposition to reinstating Indigenous cultural knowledge as a key component of land management: that is a great goal that I support. I just think that a lot of the attempts to explain it in popular (and generally non-Indigenous) literature oversimplify.

Reply
Steve
13/7/2018 05:38:02 pm

Thank you for all those great insights Ben.

I agree with your cautionary comments about gentleman's parks more likely becoming grazing properties. That's what made Australia so attractive to the wool graziers of the mid1830's. The diaries of John Batman and George Hesse record how delighted they were with the open parkland and swords of lush kangaroo grass in the Spring of 1835.

Its also true that these open woodlands were kept open by the use of indigenous burning practices. Acacias quickly filled the open spaces after the hotter fires of post settlement. In the Geelong district after the initial harvest of eucalypts and casuarinas for firewood, profitable tan bark harvesting industry emerged which made good use of the fast growing acacias for decades following.

It gives me hope to see CFA's and CMA's willing to listen and learn the spiritual art of cool burning from Indigenous elders. I look forward to the day when this practice is adopted as a preferred practice by all government departments.

Thanks again for taking the time to send through your thoughts.

Reply
Ben Courtice link
16/7/2018 03:28:40 pm

I'm not sure that all woodlands were kept open by indigenous burning. Box-Ironbark forests and woodlands of Victoria's northern slopes seem to remain fairly open by themself, with very infrequent fires at intervals of 50 years or more. Acacias can indeed germinate in great density after a hot fire, but another hot fire before they set seed can also remove the new growth. Certainly, many temperate grasslands appear to have remained mostly treeless mainly for reasons other than fire. Obviously in some locations fire also was an important element. As you can tell I don't like to agree with generalisations about fire! There is too much (non-indigenous) cultural baggage on both sides of the debate.

Reply
Bill Steentsma link
13/8/2018 02:57:25 pm

One of our Members who is a farmer saw on his Australian holiday an indigenous method of "Strip-burning" of grasslands.

Would you have a bit more literature or knowledge about this topic?
Thank you

Reply
steve
3/9/2018 02:43:22 pm

Hi Bill,
Thanks for your comment an sorry about my delay in replying. Strip burning sounds more like the CFA practice of lighting up along the edge of a burn. This tends to create a very hot fire, the antithesis of the preferred cool burning temperatures of Australia's Traditional Owners. The usual TO burning technique involves lighting lines of small spot fires a meter or so apart. This is critical to keeping the burn 'cool'. In a cool burn that I attended at Bakers Lane near Teesdale, the CFA were there to learn and observe. They started widening the spots to 5 plus meters apart, which made the fire noticeably hotter. You can read my account of the TO burn at Teesdale which expands on these ideas in my May 2017 blog 'The re-wilding of Australian culture'. Otherwise I'm not aware of this type of TO burning and others I've spoken to are not sure either. Local names can be misleading can't they.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Stephen Murphy is an author, ecologist & Master Treegrower. He has worked as a nurseryman and designer of natural landscapes for over 30 years. He presently  advises farmers, small landholders and governement agencies on sustainable landsacape design.
    His recent book:​
    ​
    'RECREATING the COUNTRY'
    Ten key principles for designing sustainable landscapes 
    Second edition Updated & expanded

    Click on the image below to read more
    Picture
    Picture
    Click here
    ​to the
     
    ​'Easy blog finder
    '

    RSS Feed

      To subscribe to monthly blogs please leave your email below. 

    submit
Picture

Site content © Stephen Murphy, 20​26

  • Home
  • be Challenged
    • Design to restore lost biodiversity >
      • Diversity >
        • Making a list of plants for revegetation
      • Structure >
        • Ecology Snapshot - wildlife and their habitat
      • Species survival
      • Location - connections
      • Blueprint for Recreating the Counrty
    • Biodiversity and profit >
      • Designing for profit
    • Managing sustainable biorich landscapes
  • be Informed
    • Indigenous flora of the Geelong district >
      • Indigenous plants - what & why
      • Acacias, wattles of the Geelong Region
      • Acacias - the cafes of the bush
      • Allocasuarinas/drooping sheoaks, Black Sheoak & Callitris glaucophylla/cypress-pine
      • Bursaria spinosa, Sweet Bursaria
      • Eucalypts, The Sentinals
      • Exocarpos cupressiformis, Cherry Ballart
      • Moonah, Melaleuca lanceolata
      • Small riparian myrtles
      • Wedge-leaf/Giant Hop-bush, Dodonaea viscosa
      • Wild Plants of Inverleigh
      • Tree Violet - as tenacious as a terrier
    • Nurseryman's diary >
      • Regent Honeyeater - a good news story
      • Give me a home among the gum trees
      • Symbiotic fungi
      • The joys of seed collecting
      • Landcare, who cares?
      • The last Silver Banksia
      • Neds Corner
      • River Red Gums and the Tuscan monks
  • be Entertained
    • Stories for children >
      • Amie and the intoxicated kangaroos
      • The Little Green Caterpillar
      • B'emus'ed - a Christmas tale of bursairas and emus
    • Stories about the natural world >
      • Brushtail
      • Cormorant
      • Eastern Bettongs. 'Truffle junkies' or 'ecosystem engineers'
      • Richards Sweet Rewards
      • Coxy's Curse
      • How the River Red Gum came to be - A dreamtime story
  • Bookshop
  • Blog
    • Easy blog finder
  • Contact